If you have been reading my blog for any length of time, you know how much I dislike statistics. I am finding though that I like the Barna Group. They do studies and research things. Generally speaking, they are considered honest and trustworthy.
Earlier today I heard about a 2 year study that Barna did. However, while looking for that study I found another one that I found extremely interesting. We, Christians, have been told by our Pastors that the reason we do things the way we do is to draw in the unchurched. This often means worshipping in the semi-dark, with lead worshippers on a stage, whiich is usually lit with spotlights. It may mean low lighting during the "sermon". It may mean have an auditorium look as opposed to a sanctuary. Most of the churches I have been to, it means LOUD music. Even during the times that are allotted for the churchgoers to visit with one another, the music blares. Conversation may be nearly impossible. The above is why I find this study so very interesting.
Barna study on church
I urge you to go to the website and look at it. I think you will find in interesting.
One part I am going to post here as I find these results very revealing,
Participators in the survey were ask to choose the word that describes their "ideal" church. Here are the results:
• Community, 78% was selected over privacy, 22%
• Sanctuary, 77% (auditorium, 23%)
• Classic, 67% (trendy, 33%)
• Quiet, 65% (loud, 35%)
• Casual, 64% (dignified, 36%)
• Modern, 60% (traditional, 40%)
So it seems that what is "really" wanted in "church" is the more traditional look. The churches that spend much money renovating the churches may have wasted their money. It seems people want to go to "church" not a nondescript place. I think that people may not like the "pretense". It seems that people do want a modern feel without being trendy. I understand why people like "casual" is more inclusive overall.
I found this study thought-provoking.
No comments:
Post a Comment